I think that'll be the title of my book when I finally write one. The basis of the concept was brought to my attention as we were looking at a flowing grass landscape, beautiful, the occasional scrub oak with a horizon of snow-capped mountains. An artist friend pointed out the beautiful striations of color; being taller, I saw more of a giraffe coloring. The comment was, "imagine that was a 2 d picture". My response, "you can't compete with Nature" discussion then morphed into winning and losing, and therefore, you can compete with Nature, you just will always lose. However, to compete is to compete, and during competition, there is no winner or loser; there is just competition. Staying in context, did Michalango win when he took the stone and turned it into a masterpiece we now know as David? Or did Nature, because Nature supplied Michalango the image of David to make out of stone? Either way, I sure am glad that Michalango engaged in that competition.
That brings me to the overarching concept and that is always compete, it is a natural right to compete even beyond that; a natural requirement. The sum of good competition is exelecence, or in quotient form 1+1=3. It is in our nature to compete, and as we evolve, we compete in different categories, but the essence remains the same. Personally I've competed for my time, that competition of time was presented to me at a fairly early age when I was told I had only a limited amount of it. Therefore being the most fininate resource in my existence I turned every decision into a competition for the time I had. Choices were made based on the resource, how much time it would take, and how much enjoyment/money/etc. I would have/earn/etc. Living in a form of an algorithm, caused me to compete for an understanding of how to make decisions more efficiently, how to get results more efficient, and therefore turning everything into a competition of my time. Everything had to compete for my time, including but certainly not limited to my work or at the time my job. Now it has morphed into my work. I am way more likely to allow my work to compete for my time than my job, with a job, it was always a competition for my time, every day, what about my job is competing for my time, that would be my daily ritual, though in algorithmic form. So many "self help" books / pod casts / channels try to achieve this very simple task, by creating efficiencies in your every day. However if at the root of your completion you are competing for efficiencies, and not time, you will be wasting time trying to become more efficient in spite of your time spent on efficient efforts. If on the other hand you realize that the end goal of efficiencies is to compete for your time, then efficiencies become second nature. You no longer question the outcome if the completion plays in your favor. So instead of trying to "game the system" you create a game of the system, you make the system compete for your time.
Developing ...
Comments
Post a Comment